Expertise Location

Summary of #KMers Twitter chat March 30, 2010.  For details, color, and to see who said what, see the full transcript.

Q1: What does ‘expertise location’ mean to you?

  • Find the right experts, with the right knowledge (I need) at the right time so I can learn to do a task
  • I like MITRE’s take of ‘connecting people to people, people to projects and projects to capabilities’.something to that effect (should be: “This capability connected people to projects to organizations and to their open document spaces, allowing staff to navigate across all these dimensions.” See background article)
  • Tapping into the expertise I need, even if I don’t know who has that expertise and without assuming you have to know the person before asking a question
  • Ability to find people based on their expertise
  • Locating and connecting with experts
  • Connecting correct info to point of need
  • Connecting people, getting answers to questions, and establishing credibility.
  • Finding the right person to bring knowledge & credibility to your point of view
  • When I don’t know what I need to know, but I believe that somebody with a certain expertise might be able to help
  • Being able to ask a question and get an answer from a person with knowledge and experience in the topic
  • To attract the attention of those who know what I need to know
  • Connect the ppl2ppl and the content will happen. Location of expertise equally as important as the location of the person.
  • Could be via open “keyword” search; pick lists (taxonomy); skill level; my work environment might even “push” experts to me
  • There are also different needs for expertise location. Specific needs (”I have a problem”) & general need (staffing a proj)
  • The problem with being the expert is the trade-off between facilitating knowledge exchange and doing your “day job”
    • Very poorly ;-)
    • We have a blended approach… elements of people, process and technology…
    • Two key ways we practice expertise location: organic and structural
    • Our KM search includes discussions, explicit knowledge, and people profiles (which often contain hidden expertise)
    • My favorite ever was IBM’s Fringe (aka Bluepages+1). Allowed for social tagging of everyone in the org. (how Fringe works)
      • Something I have not thought of before – people tagging each other instead of self tagging. That would get interesting!
      • Twitter Lists is another form of that. Anyone can put you on a list and that in essence tags you.
      • Fringe eventually transitioned into Connections Profiles where a good chunk of the features are part of the core profiling Details here
    • Combining the good old KMS with social networks / communities & expertise locators throughout the org(s)
    • We try to connect people to via hubs – Communities of Practice (CoPs), chat, blogs, wikis, forums, CMS, second life
    • Using SharePoint. Branded as ETSConnect. PPL update and publish their profiles. Next, need to help people make connections.
    • Vetting experts occurs by the community leader, ultimately, but there usually is a clear path beaten to their desk already.
      • Allow community leaders to officially designate global experts… a more structured approach to expertise location
      • Allowing expertise to emerge by who answers questions and shares knowledge in a community
    • Something to the effect of a ‘radar map’ that depicts your profile in the center & related profiles close to the center
    • We have published roles & responsibilities for designated experts, and it is factored into their reviews.
      • Our recognized experts are held to a higher standard for sharing.
      • We are adding expertise designation to annual review forms
      • I don’t think “its on ur annual eval” is enough intrinsic motivation though it sounds good on paper.
    • How do we make updating the profile as important (& automatic) as updating home address, phone, etc?
      • In a Services org (one small slice, I know), make staffing on projects dependent on keeping it up to date.
      • Starting w/ right where it hurts: their daily pain points
    • I recommend Dan Pink’s new book “Drive” (about what truly motivates human behavior)
    • Focus on finding experts through social networks / communities merging both strong & weak ties. Tools as enablers, too!
    • Have active communities for all key topics, have experts in each one, and then rely on communities to provide expertise when needed
      • Avoid redundant communities so people can ask for help in one place. Once created, communities should be led, not managed.
      • internal champions, executive vocal sponsorship, healthy budget, these items help too :)
    • Anyone know how Booz Allen Hello is working in practice (lots of good press) (see 5 Lessons Learned from Booz Allen
      • ask @meganmurray ? (side note: good example of expertise knowledge sharing on e2.0 platform)
    • Has anyone tried ‘badges’ (similar to Foursquare) for profiles and expertise location?
      • ‘Badges’ is another form of tagging – Country, Region, Continent, Language, etc
      • Haven’t tried badges, but foursquare sure hit gold at South by Southwest music festival
    • Finding experts in your company through microsharing (participant blog)
    • #1 – Communities support the business strategy of the sponsoring organization (or they don’t get deployed).
    • #2 Connections people make are a big part of the value. Problems solved. Innovative solutions delivered
    • #3 experts and knowledge managers ferret out those success stories and share them across the enterprise
    • Use as a ‘recruiting’ tool for either positions or projects.
    • Collect and promote stories of those using and benefiting, including the value received.
    • Measure reduction in time spent searching for info. Measure connectedness of corporation
    • Incentive and recognition processes & programs, ‘how to’ tools..get the extroverts and introverts participating
    • Invite WILLING participants from different silos/business units/locations/cultures & mold KM to meet their needs
    • Provide a way for those who have been helped by others to send a thank you message; display ranked list of those thanked – I picture a simple ‘thanks’ link, just like ‘like this’ in facebook
    • I’d love to know the answer to that one; in my 10+ years of doing KM I’ve never seen it consistently applied anywhere :(
    • John Hovell, KM Senior Manager Lookheed Martin
    • Rob Swanwick, Founder KMers.org
    • Jeff Hester from Fluor in So Cal
    • Theresa Sullivan, KM, Bain & Company
    • Stan Garfield, community evangelist, Deloitte.
    • Lee Romero from Deloitte in Detroit
    • Luis Suarez from Gran Canaria, KMer, CommunityBuilder & Social Computing Evangelist @ IBM
    • Ridgehead: Matt Haggerty, Ridgehead Software in Chicago
    • elmi: Elmi Bester from Pretoria, SA
  • Q2: How is your organization practicing expertise location? (next question is ‘how should it…’)

    Q3: What do we think are the optimal processes/approaches to expertise location?

     

    Q4: How do we align to strategy as well as ensure/measure business value?

     

    If you enjoyed this conversation, join #KMers for our next chat!

    Participants: 

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply